Sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and parents thereof

ABSTRACT

The invention provides seed and plants of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and the parent lines thereof. The invention thus relates to the plants, seeds and tissue cultures of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and the parent lines thereof, and to methods for producing a sweet corn plant produced by crossing such plants with themselves or with another sweet corn plant, such as a plant of another genotype. The invention further relates to seeds and plants produced by such crossing. The invention further relates to parts of such plants, including the parts of such plants.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/046,701, which was filed Oct. 4, 2013 and is now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,265,211, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of plant breeding and, more specifically, to the development of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and the inbred sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The goal of vegetable breeding is to combine various desirable traits in a single variety/hybrid. Such desirable traits may include any trait deemed beneficial by a grower and/or consumer, including greater yield, better stalks, better roots, resistance to insecticides, herbicides, pests, and disease, tolerance to heat and drought, reduced time to crop maturity, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional value, sugar content, uniformity in germination times, stand establishment, growth rate and maturity, among others.

Breeding techniques take advantage of a plant's method of pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: a plant self-pollinates if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant or plant variety. A plant cross-pollinates if pollen comes to it from a flower of a different plant variety.

Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type over many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny, a homozygous plant. A cross between two such homozygous plants of different genotypes produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that are heterozygous for many gene loci. Conversely, a cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of loci produces a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and are not uniform. The resulting non-uniformity makes performance unpredictable.

The development of uniform varieties requires the development of homozygous inbred plants, the crossing of these inbred plants, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection are examples of breeding methods that have been used to develop inbred plants from breeding populations. Those breeding methods combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more plants or various other broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new lines and hybrids derived therefrom are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new lines and hybrids are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the present invention provides a plant of the sweet corn hybrid designated SHY6RH1365, the sweet corn line SHY-6RLAL201 or sweet corn line SHY 084-5055. Also provided are corn plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of such a plant. Parts of these corn plants are also provided, for example, including pollen, an ovule, and a cell of the plant.

In another aspect of the invention, a plant of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 comprising an added heritable trait is provided. The heritable trait may comprise a genetic locus that is, for example, a dominant or recessive allele. In one embodiment of the invention, a plant of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 is defined as comprising a single locus conversion. In specific embodiments of the invention, an added genetic locus confers one or more traits such as, for example, male sterility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, sugar content, nematode or viral disease, and altered fatty acid, phytate or carbohydrate metabolism. In further embodiments, the trait may be conferred by a naturally occurring gene introduced into the genome of a line by backcrossing, a natural or induced mutation, or a transgene introduced through genetic transformation techniques into the plant or a progenitor of any previous generation thereof. When introduced through transformation, a genetic locus may comprise one or more genes integrated at a single chromosomal location.

The invention also concerns the seed of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. The corn seed of the invention may be provided, in one embodiment of the invention, as an essentially homogeneous population of corn seed of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. Essentially homogeneous populations of seed are generally free from substantial numbers of other seed. Therefore, seed of hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 may, in particular embodiments of the invention, be provided forming at least about 97% of the total seed, including at least about 98%, 99% or more of the seed. The seed population may be separately grown to provide an essentially homogeneous population of sweet corn plants designated SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055.

In yet another aspect of the invention, a tissue culture of regenerable cells of a sweet corn plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 is provided. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating corn plants capable of expressing all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the starting plant, and of regenerating plants having substantially the same genotype as the starting plant. Examples of some of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 include those traits set forth in the tables herein. The regenerable cells in such tissue cultures may be derived, for example, from embryos, meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or stalks, or from callus or protoplasts derived from those tissues. Still further, the present invention provides corn plants regenerated from a tissue culture of the invention, the plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055.

In still yet another aspect of the invention, processes are provided for producing corn seeds, plants and parts thereof, which processes generally comprise crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent corn plants is a plant of sweet corn line SHY-6RLAL201 or sweet corn line SHY 084-5055. These processes may be further exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid corn seed or plants, wherein a first corn plant is crossed with a second corn plant of a different, distinct genotype to provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents, a plant of sweet corn line SHY-6RLAL201 or sweet corn line SHY 084-5055. In these processes, crossing will result in the production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of whether the seed is collected or not.

In one embodiment of the invention, the first step in “crossing” comprises planting seeds of a first and second parent corn plant, often in proximity so that pollination will occur for example, naturally or manually. Where the plant is self-pollinated, pollination may occur without the need for direct human intervention other than plant cultivation. For hybrid crosses, it may be beneficial to detassel or otherwise emasculate the parent used as a female.

A second step may comprise cultivating or growing the seeds of first and second parent corn plants into mature plants. A third step may comprise preventing self-pollination of the plants, such as by detasseling or other means.

A fourth step for a hybrid cross may comprise cross-pollination between the first and second parent corn plants. Yet another step comprises harvesting the seeds from at least one of the parent corn plants. The harvested seed can be grown to produce a corn plant or hybrid corn plant.

The present invention also provides the corn seeds and plants produced by a process that comprises crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent corn plants is a plant of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. In one embodiment of the invention, corn seed and plants produced by the process are first generation (F₁) hybrid corn seed and plants produced by crossing a plant in accordance with the invention with another, distinct plant. The present invention further contemplates plant parts of such an F₁ hybrid corn plant, and methods of use thereof. Therefore, certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide an F₁ hybrid corn plant and seed thereof.

In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing a plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055, the method comprising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055, wherein said preparing comprises crossing a plant of the hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 with a second plant; and (b) crossing the progeny plant with itself or a second plant to produce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation. In further embodiments, the method may additionally comprise: (c) growing a progeny plant of a subsequent generation from said seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation and crossing the progeny plant of a subsequent generation with itself or a second plant; and repeating the steps for an additional 3-10 generations to produce a plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. The plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 may be an inbred line, and the aforementioned repeated crossing steps may be defined as comprising sufficient inbreeding to produce the inbred line. In the method, it may be desirable to select particular plants resulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more desirable traits, a plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 is obtained which possesses some of the desirable traits of the line/hybrid as well as potentially other selected traits.

In certain embodiments, the present invention provides a method of producing food or feed comprising: (a) obtaining a plant of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055, wherein the plant has been cultivated to maturity, and (b) collecting at least one corn from the plant.

In still yet another aspect of the invention, the genetic complement of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 is provided. The phrase “genetic complement” is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the phenotype of, in the present case, a sweet corn plant, or a cell or tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents the genetic makeup of a cell, tissue or plant, and a hybrid genetic complement represents the genetic make up of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. The invention thus provides corn plant cells that have a genetic complement in accordance with the corn plant cells disclosed herein, and seeds and plants containing such cells.

Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic marker profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. It is understood that hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 could be identified by any of the many well known techniques such as, for example, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1 8:6531-6535, 1990), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) (Wang et al., Science, 280:1077-1082, 1998).

In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides hybrid genetic complements, as represented by corn plant cells, tissues, plants, and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of a corn plant of the invention with a haploid genetic complement of a second corn plant, preferably, another, distinct corn plant. In another aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid genetic complement of this invention.

In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of determining the genotype of a plant of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 comprising detecting in the genome of the plant at least a first polymorphism. The method may, in certain embodiments, comprise detecting a plurality of polymorphisms in the genome of the plant. The method may further comprise storing the results of the step of detecting the plurality of polymorphisms on a computer readable medium. The invention further provides a computer readable medium produced by such a method.

Any embodiment discussed herein with respect to one aspect of the invention applies to other aspects of the invention as well, unless specifically noted.

The term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the standard deviation of the mean for the device or method being employed to determine the value. The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive. When used in conjunction with the word “comprising” or other open language in the claims, the words “a” and “an” denote “one or more,” unless specifically noted otherwise. The terms “comprise,” “have” and “include” are open-ended linking verbs. Any forms or tenses of one or more of these verbs, such as “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes” and “including,” are also open-ended. For example, any method that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more steps is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps and also covers other unlisted steps. Similarly, any plant that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more traits is not limited to possessing only those one or more traits and covers other unlisted traits.

Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and any specific examples provided, while indicating specific embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides methods and compositions relating to plants, seeds and derivatives of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365, sweet corn line SHY-6RLAL201 and sweet corn line SHY 084-5055. The hybrid SHY6RH1365 was produced by the cross of parent lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. The parent lines show uniformity and stability within the limits of environmental influence. By crossing the parent lines, uniform seed hybrid SHY6RH1365 can be obtained.

Hybrid SHY6RH1365 is a yellow sh2 sweet corn. Hybrid SHY6RH1365 has the RpG gene which provides resistance to some races of Puccinia sorghi (common rust) (Hu, G. and S. H. Hulbert. 1996. Construction of ‘compound’ rust genes in maize. Euphytica 87: 45-51).

SHY-6RLAL201 is a yellow sweet corn homozygous for the recessive gene sh2. Line SHY-6RLAL201 has the RpG gene which provides resistance to some races of Puccinia sorghi (common rust) (Hu, G. and S. H. Hulbert. 1996. Construction of ‘compound’ rust genes in maize. Euphytica 87: 45-51). SHY-6RLAL201 resembles inbred lines SYY093-678, SYY093-7001, and SYY-6R07003.

The development of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and its parent lines is summarized below.

A. Origin and Breeding History of Sweet Corn Hybrid SHY6RH1365

The hybrid SHY6RH1365 was produced by the cross of parent lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055.

SHY-6RLAL201 is a yellow sweet corn inbred which is homozygous for the recessive sh2 gene. The line also has the RpG gene which provides resistance to some races of Puccinia sorghi (Hu, G. and S. H. Hulbert. 1996. Construction of ‘compound’ rust genes in maize. Euphytica 87: 45-51).

SHY-6RLAL201 was produced by breeding and selection as described below:

Parent Line 1:

-   -   Winter, Year 1-Year 2: The inbred line CODE6-5 (a proprietary         Seminis inbred) was grown in a Hawaii nursery on Molokai and was         crossed onto a stock carrying the RpG allele. This stock was         obtained from Dr. Jerald Pataky of the University of Illinois.         It was coded Seminis accession B142 and was an R168 field corn         inbred converted to carry the RpG allele. This allele was         reported by Dr. Art Hooker to have come from PI 163558. CODE6-5         was grown in Hawaii nursery row 9790 and B142 was grown in         nursery row 9764. The nursery was grown by Hawaiian Research         Ltd. under a contract with Seminis. An ear harvested of this F1         cross was given a source of H00: 9790×9764/2.     -   Summer, Year 2: Seeds of the F1 with source H00: 9790×9764/2         were planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 4188 and         were crossed with inbred line CODE6-5 (a proprietary Seminis         inbred) grown in row 4187. This made a BC1 generation. An ear         harvested of this BC1 cross was given the source of N00:         4188×4187/1.     -   Winter, Year 2-Year 3: Seeds of the BC1 with source N00:         4188×4187/1 were planted in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery         row 7584 and were crossed with inbred line CODE6-5 (a         proprietary Seminis inbred) grown in row 7583. This made a BC2         generation. An ear harvested of this BC1 cross was given the         source of E01: 7584×7583/1.     -   Winter, Year 3-Year 4: Seeds of the BC2 with source E01:         7584×7583/1 were planted in Homestead, Fla. nursery row 513 and         was cross pollinated by SYY093-678 (a proprietary Seminis         inbred) in nursery row 512 to make an F1. The nursery was grown         for Seminis by 27 Farms who were paid for their services. One of         the ears of the F1 cross was given a source of C02: 513×512/2.     -   Summer, Year 4: Seeds of the F1 with source C02: 513×512/2 were         planted in Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 5219 and cross         pollinated by SYY093-678 (a proprietary Seminis inbred) in         nursery row 5218 to make a BC1. One of the ears of the BC1 cross         was give a source of N02: 5219×5218/1.     -   Winter, Year 4-Year 5: Seeds of the BC1 with source N02:         5219×5218/1 were planted in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery         row 8956 and cross pollinated by SYY093-678 (a proprietary         Seminis inbred) grown in nursery row 8955 to make a BC2. One of         the ears of the BC2 cross was give the source of E03:         8956×8955/2.     -   Summer, Year 5: Seeds of the BC2 with source E03: 8956×8955/2         were planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 5863.         Plants were inoculated with Puccinia sorghi and some of the         resistant plants were cross pollinated by SYY093-678 (a         proprietary Seminis inbred) grown in nursery row 5858 to make a         BC3. One of the ears of the BC3 cross was give the source of         N03: 5863×5858/1.     -   Winter, Year 5-Year 6: Seeds of the BC3 with source N03:         5863×5858/1 were planted in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery         row 5018 and self pollinated to make a BC3F2. One of the         harvested BC3F2 ears was given the source of E04: 5018/1. and         the name designation of N2785.     -   Summer, Year 6: Seeds of the BC3F2 with source E04: 5018/1* were         planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 4037. Plants         were inoculated with Puccinia sorghi and some of the common rust         resistant plants were self pollinated to make the BC3F3         generation. N04: 4037/2. was the source designation given to one         of the selfed ears following harvest.     -   Winter, Year 7: Seeds of the BC3F3 with source N04: 4037/2. were         planted in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery row 8525 and         self pollinated to make a BC3F4. E05: 8525/1. was the source         given to one of the BC3F4 ears.

Parent Line 2:

-   -   Winter, Year 3-Year 4: Inbred N1217NP2 (a proprietary Seminis         inbred now named SHW084-5006) was grown in the Seminis         Melipilla, Chile nursery in row 5437. This line was crossed by         inbred SYY093-678 grown in row 5427. The F1 cross was given a         hybrid designation of SVR 08717186. E02: 5437×5427 was the         source designation given to the cross.     -   Winter, Year 4-Year 5: Hybrid SVR08717186 from source E02:         5437×5427 was grown in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery in         row 9212. This line was crossed by inbred SYY093-678 grown in         row 9205 grown from source 208796 to make the BC1. The BC1 cross         was given the source designation E03: 9212×9205 and the name         N1999.     -   Summer, Year 5: Seeds of the BC1 from source E03: 9212×9205 were         planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 6626 and         plants were self pollinated to make the BC1F2. N03: 6626/1. was         the source given to one of the self pollinated ears which was         segregating for Y1 (yellow and white kernels).     -   Winter, Year 5-Year 6: White kernels of the BC1F2 from source         N03: 6626/1. were planted in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile         nursery in row 5793. and plants were self pollinated to make the         BC1F3. E04: 5793/1. Was the source given to one of the self         pollinated ears. All kernels were white.     -   Summer, Year 6: Seeds of the BC1F3 from source E04: 5793/1. were         planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery row 5585 and         plants were self pollinated to make the BC1F4. N04: 5585/1. was         the source given to one of the self pollinated ears. It was         noted that the kernels were homozygous sh2 but did not have the         su1 gene based on kernel phenotype.     -   Winter, Year 6-Year 7: Seeds of the BC1F4 from source N04:         5585/1. were planted in the Seminis Homestead, Fla. nursery row         374 and self pollinated to make the BC1F5. The nursery was grown         for Seminis by 27 Farms who were paid for their services. C05:         374/1. was the source given to one of the self pollinated ears.     -   Summer, Year 7: Seeds of the BC1F5 from source C05: 374/1. were         planted in the Seminis DeForest, Wis. nursery in row 6912 and         plants were crossed by inbred SYY093-678 grown in row 6911. N05:         6912×6911/4 was the source given to one of the harvested ears         from this cross.     -   Winter, Year 7-Year 8: Seeds of the parent 1 line from source         E05: 8525/1. were grown in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery         in range 20 column 8. Plants were crossed by parent 2 from         source N05: 6912×6911/4 grown in range 20 column 29. 05 10 6R 6R         MSME-E2_00020_00028_@_/ was the source given to a bulk of         pollinated ears from this cross. This made the F1 generation.     -   Summer, Year 8: Seeds from source 05 10 6R 6R         MSME-E2_00020_00028_@_/ were grown in range 123 column 22 of the         Monsanto Kihei, Hi. nursery field HIKIK40-KHI-KAU1-31. Plants         were cross pollinated by a haploid inducer stock. Harvested         kernels of the DH0 generation were given the source designation         06 06 31 31 HIKIK40-KHI-KAU1-31_00123_00022_@_%.     -   Winter, Year 8-Year 9: Putative haploid kernels were selected         from source 06 06 31 31 HIKIK40-KHI-KAU1-31_00123_00022_@_%.         These kernels were treated with colchicine during germination         and the germinated seedlings were transplanted to the Seminis         Melipilla, Chile nursery. Plants which shed pollen were self         pollinated to make the DH1 generation. Kernels harvested are         expected to be doubled haploids. The source designation 06 10 6R         6R MSME-EDH_00001_00010_2_. was given to one of the harvested         doubled haploid ears. This line was given the name SHY-6RLAL201.     -   SUMMER, Year 9: Seed of inbred SHY-6RLAL201 from source 06 10 6R         6R MSME-EDH_00001_00010_2_. was planted in range 6 column 23 of         field WIDE-IB1 of the Seminis DeForest, Wis. station and plants         were self pollinated to make the DH2 generation. 07 04 6R 6R         WIDE-IB1_00006_00023_@_. was the source given to a bulk of the         harvested self pollinated ears.     -   Winter, Year 9-Year 10: Seed of source 07 04 6R 6R         WIDE-IB1_00006_00023_@_. was planted in range 8 column 44 of         field MSME-E2 of the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery. Plants         were self pollinated to make the DH3 generation. 07 10 6R 6R         MSME-E2_00008_00044_1_. was the source given to one of the         harvested ears.     -   Winter, Year 10-Year 11: Seed of source 07 10 6R 6R         MSME-E2_00008_00044_1_. was grown in the Seminis Melipilla,         Chile nursery in range 10 column 1 of field MSME-E1 and plants         were self pollinated to make the DH4 generation. 08 10 6R 6R         MSME-E1_00010_00001_1_. was the source given to one of the self         pollinated ears.     -   Winter, Year 11-Year 12: Seed from source 08 10 6R 6R         MSME-E1_00010_00001_1_. was planted in range 28 columns 6-13 of         field MSME-E1 in the Seminis Melipilla, Chile nursery and plants         were self pollinated to make the DH5 generation. Plants and         harvested ears were observed to be uniform for all traits         observed. Twenty-seven of the harvested ears from these rows         were given the source designation 09 10 6R 6R         MSME-E1_00028_00013_1_. thru 09 10 6R 6R         MSME-E1_00028_00013_27_. and these ears were sent to Foundation         Seed as the breeder's seed increase of this inbred.         In winter Year 12, 30 plants from source 08 10 6R 6R         MSME-E1_00010_00001_1_. were grown in the greenhouse and         inoculated with a d-virulent isolate of Puccinia sorghi. All 30         plants were resistant which verified the presence of the RpG         gene in this stock and indicates the line is homozygous for this         allele.

Sweet corn inbred SHY-6RLAL201 was reproduced by self pollination in the winter Year 11-Year 12 in Melipilla, Chile nursery and was judged to be stable. 27 single ears were sent to Foundation Seed as Breeder's Seed. Inbred SHY-6RLAL201 is uniform for all traits observed. SHY-6RLAL201 shows no variants other than what would normally be expected due to environment or that would occur for almost any character during the course of repeated sexual reproduction.

Sweet corn line SHY 084-5055 originated from a RXY 8301×HXP 3365 cross.

B. Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Sweet Corn Hybrid SHY6RH1365, Sweet Corn Line SHY-6RLAL201 and Sweet Corn Line SHY 084-5055

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and the parent lines thereof. A description of the physiological and morphological characteristics of such plants is presented in Tables 1-3.

TABLE 1 Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Hybrid SHY6RH1365 Comparison Variety - Characteristic SHY6RH1365 Basin R 1. Type sweet sweet 2. Maturity in the Region of Best Adaptability from emergence to 50% of days: 49 days: 49 plants in silk heat units: 977.3 heat units: 956.4 from emergence to 50% of days: 49 days: 47 plants in pollen heat units: 939 heat units: 925.4 from 10% to 90% pollen shed days: 4 days: 5 heat units: 88.3 heat units: 88.3 from 50% silk to optimum edible days: 23 days: 20 quality heat units: 409.7 heat units: 402.3 from 50% silk to harvest at days: 53 days: 55 25% moisture heat units: 1092.9 heat units: 1110.3 foliage: intensity of green color dark dark 3. Plant length (tassel included) medium long (inbred lines only) ratio height of insertion of large small upper ear to plant length peduncle length medium medium plant height (to tassel tip) 185.6 cm 214.2 cm standard deviation: standard deviation 10.5817 7.47 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 ear height (to base of top ear 65.4 cm 70.2 cm node) standard deviation: standard deviation 9.0089 6.13 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 length of top ear internode 16.2 cm 15.3 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.1159 1.94 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 average number of tillers 2.6 1.2 avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation 0.8281 0.41 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 average number of ears per 1.6 1.6 stalk avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 0.488 0.51 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 anthocyanin of brace roots absent absent 4. Leaf first leaf: anthocyanin absent or very weak absent or very weak coloration of sheath first leaf: shape of apex pointed pointed undulation of margin of blade intermediate intermediate angle between blade and stem small (±25°) medium (±50°) (on leaf just above upper ear) curvature of blade moderately recurved moderately recurved anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak sheath (in middle of plant) width of blade medium medium width of ear node leaf in 9.5 cm 9.2 cm centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.6 0.623 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 length of ear node leaf in 86.1 cm 84.3 cm centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.05 3.0441 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 number of leaves above top 6 6.2 ear standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.75 0.378 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 degrees leaf angle 33° 55° color 5GY 3/4 7.5GY 4/4 sheath pubescence (1 = none to 6 9 9 = like peach fuzz) marginal waves (1 = none to 4 3 9 = many) longitudinal creases (1 = none 1 1 to 9 = many) stem: degree of zig-zag absent or very slight absent or very slight stem: anthocyanin coloration absent or very weak absent or very weak of brace roots stem: anthocyanin coloration absent or very weak absent or very weak of internodes 5. Tassel time of anthesis (on middle medium early to medium third of main axis, 50% of plants) anthocyanin coloration at base absent or very weak absent or very weak of glume (in middle third of main axis) anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak glumes excluding base anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak anthers (in middle third of main axis) angle between main axis and very small (<5°) medium (±50°) lateral branches (in lower third of tassel) curvature of lateral branches slightly recurved moderately recurved (in lower third of tassel) number of primary lateral many medium branches density of spikelets medium medium length of main axis above very long very long lowest lateral branch (A-B) length of main axis above long very long highest lateral branch (C-D) length of lateral branch medium very long number of primary lateral 29 23.5 branches standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.61 2.952 samples size: 15 sample size: 15 branch angle from central 33.8° 49.6° spike standard deviation: standard deviation: 5.0691 7.19 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 length (from top leaf collar to 38 cm 41.7 cm tassel tip) standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.7572 2.81 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 pollen shed (0 = male sterile to 5 5 9 = heavy shed) anther color 2.5GY 6/6 5GY 7/6 glume color 5GY 5/6 5GY 6/4 bar glumes (glume bands) absent absent 6. Ear (unhusked data) silk color 2.5GY 8/4 2.5GY 7/6 (3 days after emergence) (unhusked data) fresh husk 2.5GY 6/10 2.5GY 6/8 color (25 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) dry husk 5Y 8/4 2.5GY 8/4 color (65 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) position of upright upright ear at dry husk stage (unhusked data) husk 6 6 tightness (1 = very loose to 9 = very tight) (unhusked data) husk medium (<8 cm) medium (<8 cm) extension (at harvest) (husked ear data) ear length 18.8 cm 21.2 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.0281 1.18 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 (husked ear data) ear diameter 46.5 mm 41.7 mm at mid-point standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.5403 2.36 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 (husked ear data) ear weight 103.8 gm 117.6 gm standard deviation: standard deviation: 13.747 19.91 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 (husked ear data) number of 19.5 15.7 kernel rows standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.6847 1.67 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 (husked ear data) kernel rows distinct distinct (husked ear data) row slightly curved straight alignment (husked ear data) shank length 16.2 cm 15.7 cm in centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.2561 3.34 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 (husked ear data) ear taper slight average length medium long diameter (in middle) medium medium shape cylindrical conico-cylindrical number of rows of grain many medium number of colors of grains one one (only varieties with ear type of grain: sweet or waxy) grain: intensity of yellow dark medium color (only varieties with ear type of grain: sweet) grain: length (only varieties medium long with ear type of grain: sweet) grain: width (only varieties medium broad with ear type of grain: sweet) type of grain sweet sweet shrinkage of top of grain (only medium medium varieties with ear type of grain: sweet) color of top of grain yellow orange yellow orange anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak glumes of cob time of silk emergence (50% medium early to medium of plants) anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak silks 7. Kernel (dried) length 11.3 mm 11.2 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.6236 0.72 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 width 6 mm 6.9 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.7818 0.82 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 thickness 4 mm 3.8 mm standard deviation: standard deviation 8.2152 0.51 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 % round kernels (shape grade) 0% 0% sample size: n/a sample size: n/a aleurone color pattern homozygous homozygous hard endosperm color 7.5YR 7/10 7.5YR 7/10 endosperm type sweet (su1) sweet (su1) weight per 100 kernels 17.0 gm 11 gm (unsized sample) sample size: n/a sample size: n/a 8. Cob diameter at mid-point 28.9 mm 29.1 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.1211 3.41 sample size: 15 sample size: 15 color 5Y 8/4 2.5Y 8/4 9. Agronomic Traits stay green (at 65 days after 6 6 anthesis) (from 1 = worst to 9 = excellent) dropped ears 0% 0% % pre-anthesis brittle 0% 0% snapping % pre-anthesis root lodging 0% 0% post-anthesis root lodging 0% 0% *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.

TABLE 2 Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Sweet Corn Line SHY- 6RLAL201 Comparison Variety - Characteristic SHY-6RLAL201 FA32 1. Type sweet sweet 2. Region where developed in the U.S.A. north central north central 3. Maturity in the Region of Best Adaptability from emergence to 50% of days: 60 days: 76 plants in silk heat units: 1129.05 heat units: 1351.92 from emergence to 50% of days: 59 days: 80 plants in pollen heat units: 1107.35 heat units: 1436.32 from 10% to 90% pollen shed days: 6 days: 9 heat units: 153.25 heat units: 177.35 from 50% silk to optimum days: 17 days: 20 edible quality heat units: 377.8 heat units: 412.22 from 50% silk to harvest at days: 65 days: 65 25% moisture heat units: 1376.8 heat units: 1286.67 foliage: intensity of green medium medium color 4. Plant ratio height of insertion of small medium upper ear to plant length peduncle length medium very long plant height (to tassel tip) 151.8 cm 137.1 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 10.0601 11.3489 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 ear height (to base of top ear 32.9 cm 46.65 cm node) standard deviation: standard deviation: 6.3128 8.3929 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 length of top ear internode 11.3 cm 11.15 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.313 1.0291 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 average number of tillers 0.8 3.75 avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 0.7432 1.232 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 average number of ears per 2 1.8 stalk avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 0.6546 0.25 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 anthocyanin of brace roots absent absent 5. Leaf first leaf: anthocyanin absent or very weak absent or very weak coloration of sheath first leaf: shape of apex pointed to rounded pointed undulation of margin of blade intermediate intermediate angle between blade and stem medium medium (on leaf just above upper ear) curvature of blade moderately recurved moderately recurved anthocyanin coloration of absent of very weak absent of very weak sheath (in middle of plant) width of blade narrow medium width of ear node leaf in 7.3 cm 7.8 cm centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.5462 0.4613 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 length of ear node leaf in 68.2 cm 72.7 cm centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 3.5271 7.6509 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 number of leaves above top 7.5 5.45 ear standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.1254 0.6368 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 degrees leaf angle 62° 45° color 5GY 3/4 7.5gy 4/4 sheath pubescence (1 = none to 2 5 9 = like peach fuzz) marginal waves (1 = none to 4 5 9 = many) longitudinal creases (1 = none 3 1 to 9 = many) stem: degree of zig-zag slight absent or very weak stem: anthocyanin coloration absent or very weak absent or very weak of brace roots stem: anthocyanin coloration absent or very weak absent or very weak of internodes 6. Tassel time of anthesis (on middle medium late to very late third of main axis, 50% of plants) anthocyanin coloration at base absent or very weak absent or very weak of glume (in middle third of main axis) anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak glumes excluding base anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak anthers (in middle third of main axis) angle between main axis and medium small lateral branches (in lower third of tassel) curvature of lateral branches moderately recurved slightly recurved (in lower third of tassel) number of primary lateral very many medium branches density of spikelets moderately dense medium length of main axis above long medium lowest lateral branch (A-B) length of main axis above long short highest lateral branch (C-D) length of lateral branch short long number of primary lateral 39.8 20.7 branches standard deviation: standard deviation: 4.3293 2.374 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 branch angle from central 42.8° 50.65° spike standard deviation: standard deviation: 7.14 10.2255 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 length (from top leaf collar to 26.5 cm 46.2 cm tassel tip) standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.6198 5.2423 sample size: 15 sample size: 18 pollen shed (0 = male sterile to 5 7 9 = heavy shed) anther color 2.5Y 8/6 5y 8/8 glume color 5GY 7/6 5y 7/6 bar glumes (glume bands) absent absent 7. Ear (unhusked data) silk color 2.5GY 8/10 2.5gy 8/10 (3 days after emergence) (unhusked data) fresh husk 2.5GY 8/6 5gy 7/8 color (25 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) dry husk 5Y 8/4 2.5y 8/4 color (65 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) position of upright upright ear at dry husk stage (unhusked data) husk 6 3 tightness (1 = very loose to 9 = very tight) (unhusked data) husk long (8-10 cm beyond long extension (at harvest) the ear tip) (husked ear data) ear length 11.3 cm 10.5 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.9733 1.7386 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 (husked ear data) ear diameter 41.5 mm 28.95 mm at mid-point standard deviation: standard deviation: 3.0797 4.3197 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 (husked ear data) ear weight 47.1 gm 24 gm standard deviation: standard deviation: 10.9861 8.384 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 (husked ear data) number of 18.4 10.1 kernel rows standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.2983 2.9065 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 (husked ear data) kernel rows distinct distinct (husked ear data) row slightly curved straight alignment (husked ear data) shank length 12.8 cm 23.4 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 3.5374 9.5326 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 (husked ear data) ear taper extreme average length short short diameter (in middle) medium small shape conical conico-cylindrical number of rows of grain many medium number of colors of grains one one (only varieties with ear type of grain: sweet or waxy) grain: intensity of yellow medium medium color (only varieties with ear type of grain: sweet) grain: length (only varieties long medium with ear type of grain: sweet) grain: width (only varieties medium medium with ear type of grain: sweet) type of grain sweet sweet shrinkage of top of grain (only medium strong varieties with ear type of grain: sweet) color of top of grain yellow yellow anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak glumes of cob time of silk emergence (50% medium late to very late of plants) anthocyanin coloration of absent or very weak absent or very weak silks 8. Kernel (dried) length 11.1 mm 7 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.4749 1.0242 sample size: 15 sample size: 30 width 7.3 mm 6 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.5011 0.694 sample size: 15 sample size: 30 thickness 2.47 mm 5.25 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.3863 1.191 sample size: 15 sample size: 30 % round kernels (shape grade) 0.00% 1% standard deviation: standard deviation: 0 sample size: 100 sample size: 200 aleurone color pattern homozygous homozygous aleurone color 2.5Y 8/8 2.5y 8/8 hard endosperm color 2.5Y 8/8 2.5y 8/8 endosperm type sweet (su1) sweet weight per 100 kernels 10 gm 12.0 gm (unsized sample) standard deviation: standard deviation: sample size: 100 n/a sample size: 200 9. Cob diameter at mid-point 25.5 mm 22.35 mm standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.4979 2.528 sample size: 15 sample size: 22 color 5Y 8/4 2.5y 8/2 12. Agronomic Traits stay green (at 65 days after 3 3 anthesis) (from 1 = worst to 9 = excellent) dropped ears 0.00%   0% % pre-anthesis brittle 0% 0% snapping % pre-anthesis root lodging 0% 0% post-anthesis root lodging 0.00%   0.00%   *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.

TABLE 3 Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Sweet Corn Line SHY 084-5055 Comparison Variety - Characteristic SHY 084-5055 WH92047 1. Type sweet sweet 2. Region where developed in the U.S.A. midwest midwest 3. Maturity in the Region of Best Adaptability from emergence to 50% of days: 70 days: 86 plants in silk heat units: 1412.56 heat units: 1218.85 from emergence to 50% of days: 69 days: 85 plants in pollen heat units: 1392.52 heat units: 1197.5 from 10% to 90% pollen shed days: 5 days: 3 heat units: 100 heat units: 58 from 50% silk to optimum days: 26 days: 19 edible quality heat units: 368.97 heat units: 396.8 from 50% silk to harvest at days: 62 days: 58 25% moisture heat units: 842.24 heat units: 1205.9 4. Plant length (tassel included) Short Medium (inbred lines only) ratio height of insertion of Small medium upper ear to plant length plant height (to tassel tip) 126.34 cm 91.1 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 5.2661 7.4347 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 ear height (to base of top ear 27.82 cm 27.95 cm node) standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.0684 2.6191 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 length of top ear internode 12.38 cm 12.1 cm standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.3221 1.1319 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 average number of tillers 2.48 1.7 avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 1.0441 0.6962 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 average number of ears per 1.85 3.3 stalk avg standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 0.6985 0.5786 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 anthocyanin of brace roots absent absent 5. Leaf first leaf: anthocyanin absent or very weak absent or very weak coloration of sheath first leaf: shape of tip pointed [W117] pointed angle between blade and stem large very small (on leaf just above upper ear) angle between blade and stem strongly recurved straight (on leaf just above upper ear) anthocyanin coloration of Absent or very weak Absent or very weak sheath (in middle of plant) width of blade medium [A632] medium width of ear node leaf in 4.84 7.57 centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.3052 0.5575 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 length of ear node leaf in 73 70.6 centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.2162 3.2304 sample size: 60 Sample size: 30 number of leaves above top 5.27 7.5 ear standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.6295 1.1313 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 degrees leaf angle 42.3 37 color 5gy 4/4 5gy 4/4 sheath pubescence (1 = none to 2 5 9 = like peach fuzz) marginal waves (1 = none to 3 6 9 = many) longitudinal creases (1 = none 1 1 to 9 = many) stem: degree of zig-zag absent or very slight absent or very slight stem: anthocyanin coloration absent or very weak weak of brace roots 6. Tassel time of anthesis (on middle very early to early medium third of main axis, 50% of plants) anthocyanin coloration at base absent or very weak absent or very weak of glume (in middle third of main axis) anthocyanin coloration of medium absent or very weak glumes excluding base anthocyanin coloration of weak absent or very weak anthers (in middle third of main axis) angle between main axis and very small medium lateral branches (in lower third of tassel) attitude of lateral branches (in slightly recurved straight lower third of tassel) number of primary lateral 25.27 13.93 branches standard deviation: standard deviation: 4.3424 3.0533 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 density of spikelets medium [W401] lax length of main axis above short [EP1] short lowest side branch length of main axis above medium [F259] medium upper side branch length of side branches short [f2] medium number of primary lateral medium [F244] medium branches branch angle from central 40.1° 44° spike standard deviation: standard deviation: 9.5581 13.7209 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 length (from top leaf collar to 38.97 cm 24 cm tassel tip) standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.3796 1.5257 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 pollen shed (0 = male sterile to 7 6 9 = heavy shed) anther color 2.5gy 7/6 2.5gy 7/6 glume color 5gy 7/6 5gy 6/6 bar glumes (glume bands) Absent absent 7. Ear (unhusked data) silk color 2.5gy 8/6 2.5gy 8/8 (3 days after emergence) (unhusked data) fresh husk 5gy 5/6 2.5gy 6/6 color (25 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) dry husk 2.5gy 7/6 2.5y 8/6 color (65 days after 50% silking) (unhusked data) position of upright upright ear at dry husk stage (unhusked data) husk 8 6 tightness (1 = very loose to 9 = very tight) (unhusked data) husk Long (8-10 cm beyond medium extension (at harvest) the . . . ) (husked ear data) ear length 14.29 10.55 in centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.0651 1.4513 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 (husked ear data) ear diameter 28.74 34.49 at mid-point in millimeters standard deviation: avg standard deviation: 8.5982 3.8469 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 (husked ear data) ear weight 24.15 36.67 in grams standard deviation: standard deviation: 9.8383 12.3794 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 (husked ear data) number of 14 15.13 kernel rows standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.6167 2.6821 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 (husked ear data) kernel rows Indistinct distinct (husked ear data) row slightly curved straight alignment (husked ear data) shank length 8.77 8.98 in centimeters standard deviation: standard deviation: 3.0986 2.9215 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 (husked ear data) ear taper extreme slight length of peduncle medium [W182E] short length (without husk) medium [A65] short diameter (in middle) Medium small shape Cylindrical Conico-cylindrical number of rows of grain Few medium color of dorsal side of grain yellow [A654] yellow type of grain sweet [Jubilee] sweet color of top of grain Yellow orange Yellow orange anthocyanin coloration of Absent Absent glumes of cob time of silk emergence (50% Very late Late to very late of plants) anthocyanin coloration of Absent Absent silks 8. Kernel (dried) Length (mm) 6.85 7.27 standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.1008 1.2408 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 Width (mm) 6.84 7 standard deviation: standard deviation: 0.9221 0.833 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 Thickness (mm) 4.23 4.87 standard deviation: standard deviation: 1.0895 1.3291 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 % round kernels (shape grade) 49.75 2.00 standard deviation 0 standard deviation: 0 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 aleurone color pattern 1 1 aleurone color 2.5y 8/10 2.5y 8/10 hard endosperm color 2.5y 8/10 2.5y 8/10 endosperm type sweet (su1) sweet weight per 100 kernels 8.23 13.5 (unsized sample) standard deviation: 0 standard deviation: 0 sample size: 200 sample size: 100 9. Cob diameter at mid-point 23.81 22.56 standard deviation: standard deviation: 2.2061 2.1828 sample size: 60 sample size: 30 color 5y 8/4 5y 8/4 12. Agronomic Traits dropped ears 0% 0% % pre-anthesis brittle 0% 0% snapping % pre-anthesis root lodging 0% 0% post-anthesis root lodging 0% 0% *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.

C. Breeding Corn Plants

One aspect of the current invention concerns methods for producing seed of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 involving crossing sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. Alternatively, in other embodiments of the invention, hybrid SHY6RH1365, line SHY-6RLAL201, or line SHY 084-5055 may be crossed with itself or with any second plant. Such methods can be used for propagation of hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or the sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055, or can be used to produce plants that are derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or the sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055. Plants derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365 and/or the sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 may be used, in certain embodiments, for the development of new corn varieties.

The development of new varieties using one or more starting varieties is well known in the art. In accordance with the invention, novel varieties may be created by crossing hybrid SHY6RH1365 followed by multiple generations of breeding according to such well known methods. New varieties may be created by crossing with any second plant. In selecting such a second plant to cross for the purpose of developing novel lines, it may be desired to choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Once initial crosses have been made, inbreeding and selection take place to produce new varieties. For development of a uniform line, often five or more generations of selfing and selection are involved.

Uniform lines of new varieties may also be developed by way of double-haploids. This technique allows the creation of true breeding lines without the need for multiple generations of selfing and selection. In this manner true breeding lines can be produced in as little as one generation. Haploid embryos may be produced from microspores, pollen, anther cultures, or ovary cultures. The haploid embryos may then be doubled autonomously, or by chemical treatments (e.g. colchicine treatment). Alternatively, haploid embryos may be grown into haploid plants and treated to induce chromosome doubling. In either case, fertile homozygous plants are obtained. In accordance with the invention, any of such techniques may be used in connection with a plant of the invention and progeny thereof to achieve a homozygous line.

Backcrossing can also be used to improve an inbred plant. Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one inbred or non-inbred source to an inbred that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate locus or loci for the trait in question. The progeny of this cross are then mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny have the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other loci. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure breeding progeny for the trait being transferred.

The plants of the present invention are particularly well suited for the development of new lines based on the elite nature of the genetic background of the plants. In selecting a second plant to cross with SHY6RH1365 and/or sweet corn lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055 for the purpose of developing novel corn lines, it will typically be preferred to choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Examples of desirable traits may include, in specific embodiments, male sterility, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility, sugar content, and enhanced nutritional quality.

D. Performance Characteristics

As described above, hybrid SHY6RH1365 exhibits desirable agronomic traits. The performance characteristics of hybrid SHY6RH1365 were the subject of an objective analysis of the performance traits relative to other varieties. The results of the analysis are presented below.

TABLE 4 Performance Data for Hybrid SHY6RH1365 and Comparative Variety HEAT UNITS EAR PERCENT OF EARS WITH TO PLANT EAR EAR DIAM- A ROW COUNT OF: Planting MID- HEIGHT HEIGHT LENGTH ETER Greater Date HYBRID Rep# SILK (inches) (inches) (inches (inches) 12 14 16 18 20 than 20 May 20, 2011 SHY6RH1365 1 1239 79 25 8.4 1.9 0 0 30 40 30 0 May 20, 2011 SHY6RH1365 2 1239 76 25 8.6 1.9 0 10 40 50 0 0 May 20, 2011 SHY6RH1365 3 1239 79 35 8.5 1.95 0 0 20 30 50 0 AVERAGE 1239.0 78.0 28.3 8.5 1.9 0.0 3.3 30.0 40.0 26.7 0.0 May 20, 2011 BASIN R 1 1267 81 37 9.3 1.7 0 60 40 0 0 0 May 20, 2011 BASIN R 2 1267 74 33 9.2 1.7 10 60 30 0 0 0 May 20, 2011 BASIN R 3 1239 82 26 9.3 1.6 0 50 30 20 0 0 AVERAGE 1257.7 79.0 32.0 9.3 1.7 3.3 56.7 33.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 Jun. 8, 2011 SHY6RH1365 1 1193 91 34 8.2 2 0 0 20 50 30 0 Jun. 8, 2011 SHY6RH1365 2 1193 83 30 8.4 1.9 0 0 30 40 30 0 Jun. 8, 2011 SHY6RH1365 3 1164 86 28 8.3 1.9 0 0 30 60 10 0 AVERAGE 1183.3 86.7 30.7 8.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 26.7 50.0 23.3 0.0 Jun. 8, 2011 BASIN R 1 1255 91 28 9.4 1.8 0 30 60 10 0 0 Jun. 8, 2011 BASIN R 2 1164 88 27 9.1 1.9 0 20 70 10 0 0 Jun. 8, 2011 BASIN R 3 1193 85 26 9.2 1.7 10 0 50 40 0 0 AVERAGE 1204.0 88.0 27.0 9.2 1.8 3.3 16.7 60.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 SHY6RH1365 TOTAL AVG 1211.2 82.3 29.5 8.4 1.9 0.0 1.7 28.3 45.0 25.0 0.0 BASIN R TOTAL AVG 1230.8 83.5 29.5 9.3 1.7 3.3 36.7 46.7 13.3 0.0 0.0

E. Further Embodiments of the Invention

In certain aspects of the invention, plants described herein are provided modified to include at least a first desired heritable trait. Such plants may, in one embodiment, be developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to a genetic locus transferred into the plant via the backcrossing technique. The term single locus converted plant as used herein refers to those corn plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to the single locus transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique. By essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics, it is meant that the characteristics of a plant are recovered that are otherwise present when compared in the same environment, other than an occasional variant trait that might arise during backcrossing or direct introduction of a transgene.

Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into the present variety. The parental corn plant which contributes the locus for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental corn plant to which the locus or loci from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol.

In a typical backcross protocol, the original variety of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second variety (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single locus of interest to be transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a corn plant is obtained wherein essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred locus from the nonrecurrent parent.

The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the original variety. To accomplish this, a single locus of the recurrent variety is modified or substituted with the desired locus from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological constitution of the original variety. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable trait to the plant. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered and the genetic distance between the recurrent and nonrecurrent parents. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele, or an additive allele (between recessive and dominant), may also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred.

In one embodiment, progeny corn plants of a backcross in which a plant described herein is the recurrent parent comprise (i) the desired trait from the non-recurrent parent and (ii) all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of corn the recurrent parent as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmental conditions.

New varieties can also be developed from more than two parents. The technique, known as modified backcrossing, uses different recurrent parents during the backcrossing. Modified backcrossing may be used to replace the original recurrent parent with a variety having certain more desirable characteristics or multiple parents may be used to obtain different desirable characteristics from each.

With the development of molecular markers associated with particular traits, it is possible to add additional traits into an established germ line, such as represented here, with the end result being substantially the same base germplasm with the addition of a new trait or traits. Molecular breeding, as described in Moose and Mumm, 2008 (Plant Physiology, 147: 969-977), for example, and elsewhere, provides a mechanism for integrating single or multiple traits or QTL into an elite line. This molecular breeding-facilitated movement of a trait or traits into an elite line may encompass incorporation of a particular genomic fragment associated with a particular trait of interest into the elite line by the mechanism of identification of the integrated genomic fragment with the use of flanking or associated marker assays. In the embodiment represented here, one, two, three or four genomic loci, for example, may be integrated into an elite line via this methodology. When this elite line containing the additional loci is further crossed with another parental elite line to produce hybrid offspring, it is possible to then incorporate at least eight separate additional loci into the hybrid. These additional loci may confer, for example, such traits as a disease resistance or a fruit quality trait. In one embodiment, each locus may confer a separate trait. In another embodiment, loci may need to be homozygous and exist in each parent line to confer a trait in the hybrid. In yet another embodiment, multiple loci may be combined to confer a single robust phenotype of a desired trait.

Many single locus traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single locus traits may or may not be transgenic; examples of these traits include, but are not limited to, male sterility, waxy starch, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, sugar content, male fertility and enhanced nutritional quality. These genes are generally inherited through the nucleus, but may be inherited through the cytoplasm. Some known exceptions to this are genes for male sterility, some of which are inherited cytoplasmically, but still act as a single locus trait.

Direct selection may be applied where the single locus acts as a dominant trait. For this selection process, the progeny of the initial cross are assayed for viral resistance and/or the presence of the corresponding gene prior to the backcrossing. Selection eliminates any plants that do not have the desired gene and resistance trait, and only those plants that have the trait are used in the subsequent backcross. This process is then repeated for all additional backcross generations.

Selection of corn plants for breeding is not necessarily dependent on the phenotype of a plant and instead can be based on genetic investigations. For example, one can utilize a suitable genetic marker which is closely genetically linked to a trait of interest. One of these markers can be used to identify the presence or absence of a trait in the offspring of a particular cross, and can be used in selection of progeny for continued breeding. This technique is commonly referred to as marker assisted selection. Any other type of genetic marker or other assay which is able to identify the relative presence or absence of a trait of interest in a plant can also be useful for breeding purposes. Procedures for marker assisted selection are well known in the art. Such methods will be of particular utility in the case of recessive traits and variable phenotypes, or where conventional assays may be more expensive, time consuming or otherwise disadvantageous. Types of genetic markers which could be used in accordance with the invention include, but are not necessarily limited to, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1 8:6531-6535, 1990), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) (Wang et al., Science, 280:1077-1082, 1998).

F. Plants Derived by Genetic Engineering

Many useful traits that can be introduced by backcrossing, as well as directly into a plant, are those which are introduced by genetic transformation techniques. Genetic transformation may therefore be used to insert a selected transgene into a plant of the invention or may, alternatively, be used for the preparation of transgenes which can be introduced by backcrossing. Methods for the transformation of plants that are well known to those of skill in the art and applicable to many crop species include, but are not limited to, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and direct DNA uptake by protoplasts.

To effect transformation by electroporation, one may employ either friable tissues, such as a suspension culture of cells or embryogenic callus or alternatively one may transform immature embryos or other organized tissue directly. In this technique, one would partially degrade the cell walls of the chosen cells by exposing them to pectin-degrading enzymes (pectolyases) or mechanically wound tissues in a controlled manner.

An efficient method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells is microprojectile bombardment. In this method, particles are coated with nucleic acids and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, platinum, and preferably, gold. For the bombardment, cells in suspension are concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate.

An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into plant cells by acceleration is the Biolistics Particle Delivery System, which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a surface covered with target cells. The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. Microprojectile bombardment techniques are widely applicable, and may be used to transform virtually any plant species.

Agrobacterium-mediated transfer is another widely applicable system for introducing gene loci into plant cells. An advantage of the technique is that DNA can be introduced into whole plant tissues, thereby bypassing the need for regeneration of an intact plant from a protoplast. Modern Agrobacterium transformation vectors are capable of replication in E. coli as well as Agrobacterium, allowing for convenient manipulations (Klee et al., Bio-Technology, 3(7):637-642, 1985). Moreover, recent technological advances in vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer have improved the arrangement of genes and restriction sites in the vectors to facilitate the construction of vectors capable of expressing various polypeptide coding genes. The vectors described have convenient multi-linker regions flanked by a promoter and a polyadenylation site for direct expression of inserted polypeptide coding genes. Additionally, Agrobacterium containing both armed and disarmed Ti genes can be used for transformation.

In those plant strains where Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is efficient, it is the method of choice because of the facile and defined nature of the gene locus transfer. The use of Agrobacterium-mediated plant integrating vectors to introduce DNA into plant cells is well known in the art (Fraley et al., Bio/Technology, 3:629-635, 1985; U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055).

Transformation of plant protoplasts also can be achieved using methods based on calcium phosphate precipitation, polyethylene glycol treatment, electroporation, and combinations of these treatments (see, e.g., Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199:183-188, 1985; Omirulleh et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 21(3):415-428, 1993; Fromm et al., Nature, 312:791-793, 1986; Uchimiya et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 204:204, 1986; Marcotte et al., Nature, 335:454, 1988). Transformation of plants and expression of foreign genetic elements is exemplified in Choi et al. (Plant Cell Rep., 13: 344-348, 1994), and Ellul et al. (Theor. Appl. Genet., 107:462-469, 2003).

A number of promoters have utility for plant gene expression for any gene of interest including but not limited to selectable markers, scoreable markers, genes for pest tolerance, disease resistance, nutritional enhancements and any other gene of agronomic interest. Examples of constitutive promoters useful for plant gene expression include, but are not limited to, the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) P-35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odel et al., Nature, 313:810, 1985), including in monocots (see, e.g., Dekeyser et al., Plant Cell, 2:591, 1990; Terada and Shimamoto, Mol. Gen. Genet., 220:389, 1990); a tandemly duplicated version of the CaMV 35S promoter, the enhanced 35S promoter (P-e35S); 1 the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al., Plant Physiol., 88:547, 1988); the octopine synthase promoter (Fromm et al., Plant Cell, 1:977, 1989); and the figwort mosaic virus (P-FMV) promoter as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619 and an enhanced version of the FMV promoter (P-eFMV) where the promoter sequence of P-FMV is duplicated in tandem; the cauliflower mosaic virus 19S promoter; a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter; a commelina yellow mottle virus promoter; and other plant DNA virus promoters known to express in plant cells.

A variety of plant gene promoters that are regulated in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, and/or developmental signals can also be used for expression of an operably linked gene in plant cells, including promoters regulated by (1) heat (Callis et al., Plant Physiol., 88:965, 1988), (2) light (e.g., pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al., Plant Cell, 1:471, 1989; maize rbcS promoter, Schaffner and Sheen, Plant Cell, 3:997, 1991; or chlorophyll a/b-binding protein promoter, Simpson et al., EMBO J., 4:2723, 1985), (3) hormones, such as abscisic acid (Marcotte et al., Plant Cell, 1:969, 1989), (4) wounding (e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al., Plant Cell, 1:961, 1989); or (5) chemicals such as methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, or Safener. It may also be advantageous to employ organ-specific promoters (e.g., Roshal et al., EMBO J., 6:1155, 1987; Schernthaner et al., EMBO J., 7:1249, 1988; Bustos et al., Plant Cell, 1:839, 1989).

Exemplary nucleic acids which may be introduced to plants of this invention include, for example, DNA sequences or genes from another species, or even genes or sequences which originate with or are present in the same species, but are incorporated into recipient cells by genetic engineering methods rather than classical reproduction or breeding techniques. However, the term “exogenous” is also intended to refer to genes that are not normally present in the cell being transformed, or perhaps simply not present in the form, structure, etc., as found in the transforming DNA segment or gene, or genes which are normally present and that one desires to express in a manner that differs from the natural expression pattern, e.g., to over-express. Thus, the term “exogenous” gene or DNA is intended to refer to any gene or DNA segment that is introduced into a recipient cell, regardless of whether a similar gene may already be present in such a cell. The type of DNA included in the exogenous DNA can include DNA which is already present in the plant cell, DNA from another plant, DNA from a different organism, or a DNA generated externally, such as a DNA sequence containing an antisense message of a gene, or a DNA sequence encoding a synthetic or modified version of a gene.

Many hundreds if not thousands of different genes are known and could potentially be introduced into a corn plant according to the invention. Non-limiting examples of particular genes and corresponding phenotypes one may choose to introduce into a corn plant include one or more genes for insect tolerance, such as a Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) gene, pest tolerance such as genes for fungal disease control, herbicide tolerance such as genes conferring glyphosate tolerance, and genes for quality improvements such as yield, nutritional enhancements, environmental or stress tolerances, or any desirable changes in plant physiology, growth, development, morphology or plant product(s). For example, structural genes would include any gene that confers insect tolerance including but not limited to a Bacillus insect control protein gene as described in WO 99/31248, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,052, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,500,365 and 5,880,275, herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. In another embodiment, the structural gene can confer tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate as conferred by genes including, but not limited to Agrobacterium strain CP4 glyphosate resistant EPSPS gene (aroA:CP4) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, or glyphosate oxidoreductase gene (GOX) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Alternatively, the DNA coding sequences can affect these phenotypes by encoding a non-translatable RNA molecule that causes the targeted inhibition of expression of an endogenous gene, for example via antisense- or cosuppression-mediated mechanisms (see, for example, Bird et al., Biotech. Gen. Engin. Rev., 9:207, 1991). The RNA could also be a catalytic RNA molecule (i.e., a ribozyme) engineered to cleave a desired endogenous mRNA product (see for example, Gibson and Shillito, Mol. Biotech., 7:125, 1997). Thus, any gene which produces a protein or mRNA which expresses a phenotype or morphology change of interest is useful for the practice of the present invention.

G. Definitions

In the description and tables herein, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided:

Allele: Any of one or more alternative forms of a gene locus, all of which alleles relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.

Backcrossing: A process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny, for example a first generation hybrid (F₁), back to one of the parents of the hybrid progeny. Backcrossing can be used to introduce one or more single locus conversions from one genetic background into another.

Crossing: The mating of two parent plants.

Cross-pollination: Fertilization by the union of two gametes from different plants.

Diploid: A cell or organism having two sets of chromosomes.

Emasculate: The removal of plant male sex organs or the inactivation of the organs with a cytoplasmic or nuclear genetic factor or a chemical agent conferring male sterility.

Enzymes: Molecules which can act as catalysts in biological reactions.

F₁ Hybrid: The first generation progeny of the cross of two nonisogenic plants.

Genotype: The genetic constitution of a cell or organism.

Haploid: A cell or organism having one set of the two sets of chromosomes in a diploid.

Linkage: A phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent.

Marker: A readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e., heritability of 1.

Phenotype: The detectable characteristics of a cell or organism, which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression.

Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Quantitative trait loci (QTL) refer to genetic loci that control to some degree numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed.

Resistance: As used herein, the terms “resistance” and “tolerance” are used interchangeably to describe plants that show no symptoms to a specified biotic pest, pathogen, abiotic influence or environmental condition. These terms are also used to describe plants showing some symptoms but that are still able to produce marketable product with an acceptable yield. Some plants that are referred to as resistant or tolerant are only so in the sense that they may still produce a crop, even though the plants are stunted and the yield is reduced.

Regeneration: The development of a plant from tissue culture.

Self-pollination: The transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same plant.

Single Locus Converted (Conversion) Plant: Plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of a corn variety are recovered in addition to the characteristics of the single locus transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique and/or by genetic transformation.

Substantially Equivalent: A characteristic that, when compared, does not show a statistically significant difference (e.g., p=0.05) from the mean.

Tissue Culture: A composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant.

Transgene: A genetic locus comprising a sequence which has been introduced into the genome of a corn plant by transformation.

H. Deposit Information

A deposit of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and parent lines SHY-6RLAL201 and SHY 084-5055, disclosed above and recited in the claims, has been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, Va. 20110-2209. The date of the deposits were, May 31, 2012, May 15, 2012, and May 15, 2012, respectively. The accession numbers for those deposited seeds of sweet corn hybrid SHY6RH1365 and parent line SHY 084-5055 are ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926, ATCC Accession Number PTA-12892, and ATCC Accession Number PTA-12894, respectively. Upon issuance of a patent, all restrictions upon the deposits will be removed, and the deposits are intended to meet all of the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §1.801-1.809. The deposits will be maintained in the depository for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the last request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if necessary during that period.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the invention, as limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

All references cited herein are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A corn plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 2. A seed of hybrid SHY6RH1365, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 3. A seed that produces the plant of claim
 1. 4. A plant part of the plant of claim
 1. 5. The plant part of claim 4, further defined as an ear, ovule, pollen or cell.
 6. A tissue culture of regenerable cells of the plant of claim
 1. 7. The tissue culture according to claim 6, comprising cells or protoplasts from a plant part selected from the group consisting of leaf, pollen, root, root tip, anther, silk, flower, kernel, ear, cob, husk, stalk and meristem.
 8. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 6, wherein said plant has all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of corn hybrid SHY6RH1365, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 9. A method of vegetatively propagating the plant of claim 1, the method comprising the steps of: (a) collecting tissue capable of being propagated from the plant according to claim 1; (b) cultivating said tissue to obtain proliferated shoots; and (c) rooting said proliferated shoots to obtain rooted plantlets.
 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising growing at least a first plant from said rooted plantlets.
 11. A method of introducing a desired trait into a corn hybrid, the method comprising: (a) introducing at least a first heritable trait into at least one corn line selected from the group consisting of line SHY 084-5055 and line SHY-6RLAL201 to produce a plant of the first inbred corn line that heritably carries the trait, wherein the heritable trait is introduced into said first corn line by backcrossing and wherein representative samples of seed of corn line SHY 084-5055 and line SHY-6RLAL201 have been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12894, and ATCC Accession Number PTA-12892, respectively; and (b) crossing a plant of the first inbred corn line that heritably carries the trait with a plant of a different line selected from said group consisting of SHY 084-5055 and line SHY-6RLAL201 to produce a plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365 comprising the heritable trait, wherein a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 12. A corn plant produced by the method of claim 11, wherein the plant comprises the desired trait and otherwise comprises essentially all of the morphological and phenotypic traits of hybrid SHY6RH1365, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 13. A method of producing a plant comprising an added trait, the method comprising introducing a transgene conferring the trait into a plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926.
 14. A plant produced by the method of claim 13, wherein said transgene is introduced by genetic transformation.
 15. A corn plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365, further comprising a transgene, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926, wherein said plant otherwise comprises essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of hybrid SHY6RH1365.
 16. The plant of claim 15, wherein the transgene confers a trait selected from the group consisting of male sterility, herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, pest resistance, disease resistance, modified fatty acid metabolism, environmental stress tolerance, modified carbohydrate metabolism and modified protein metabolism.
 17. A corn plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365, further comprising a single locus conversion, a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926, wherein said plant otherwise comprises essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of hybrid SHY6RH1365.
 18. The plant of claim 17, wherein the single locus conversion confers a trait selected from the group consisting of male sterility, herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, pest resistance, disease resistance, modified fatty acid metabolism, environmental stress tolerance, modified carbohydrate metabolism and modified protein metabolism.
 19. A method for producing a seed of a plant derived from hybrid SHY6RH1365, the method comprising the steps of: (a) crossing a corn plant of hybrid SHY6RH1365 with itself or a second corn plant; a sample of seed of said hybrid having been deposited under ATCC Accession Number PTA-12926; and (b) allowing seed of a hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn plant to form.
 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the steps of: (c) selfing a plant grown from said hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn seed to yield additional hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn seed; (d) growing said additional hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn seed of step (c) to yield additional hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn plants; and (e) repeating the selfing and growing steps of (c) and (d) to generate at least a first further hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn plant.
 21. The method of claim 19, wherein the second corn plant is of an inbred corn line.
 22. The method of claim 20, further comprising: (f) crossing the further hybrid SHY6RH1365-derived corn plant with a different corn plant to produce seed of a hybrid progeny plant.
 23. A method of producing a corn seed, the method comprising crossing the plant of claim 1 with itself or a second corn plant and allowing seed to form.
 24. A method of producing a corn ear, the method comprising: (a) obtaining the plant according to claim 1, wherein the plant has been cultivated to maturity; and (b) collecting a corn ear from the plant. 